Archive for the ‘Headlines’ Category

(This could be) The Last Time*

20/12/2012
rolling stones the last time 1965

‘The Last Time’: Rolling Stones (1965).

Have to post this in haste – it’s already almost 21.12.2012 here in Bulgaria!

We all know the end of the world is due some time tomorrow, of course.

So, here’s a parting, nostalgic piece of music from *The Rolling Stones, to comfort you all. (Click on the image above to go to YouTube).

Rolling Stones ‘The Last Time’ Lyrics

Songwriters: Jagger, Mick / Richards, Keith

Well I told you once and I told you twice

But ya never listen to my advice

You don’t try very hard to please me

With what you know it should be easy

Well this could be the last time

This could be the last time

Maybe the last time

I don’t know. oh no. oh no

Well, I’m sorry girl but I can’t stay

Feelin’ like I do today

It’s too much pain and too much sorrow

Guess I’ll feel the same tomorrow

Well this could be the last time

This could be the last time

Maybe the last time

I don’t know. oh no. oh no

Well I told you once and I told you twice

That someone will have to pay the price

But here’s a chance to change your mind

Cuz I’ll be gone a long, long time

Well this could be the last time

This could be the last time

Maybe the last time

I don’t know. oh no. oh no

Well, this could be the last time

The Last Time lyrics © ABKCO Music Inc., EMI Music Publishing

***********

Чао, ciao, bye-bye!

philinsofia.

Image: YouTube

Gideon Levy: ‘What’s a nice Jewish boy doing in a state like this?’ *

21/11/2012
gideon levy haaretz journalist

‘The most hated man in Israel?’

I was hoping to move away from the ongoing Israel-Gaza tragedy, but chance intervened today, in the form of an extended interview by Johann Hari with the renowned  award-winning Jewish journalist at Haaretz, Gideon Levy. (* It’s his own quote, above, by the way.)

The son of a WWII refugee from Sudetenland, Levy admits he grew up as an Israeli nationalist, not questing the general, majority dismissal of, and contempt – or worse – towards, Palestinians.

His attitude changed when he started reporting for Haaretz[2] from the West Bank and Gaza, and in the intervening 30 years, he has become a rare voice speaking up for peace, tolerance and  understanding.

In so doing, he has enraged majority Israeli opinion, regularly receives hate mail, has been physically threatened many times, been deliberately shot at by the Israeli army, and was even the target of a legal amendment that now precludes him from setting foot in Gaza. He’s also regarded as a “security risk”.

A few quotes from the interview

“My biggest struggle,” he says, “is to rehumanize the Palestinians. There’s a whole machinery of brainwashing in Israel which really accompanies each of us from early childhood, and I’m a product of this machinery as much as anyone else. [We are taught] a few narratives that it’s very hard to break. That we Israelis are the ultimate and only victims. That the Palestinians are born to kill, and their hatred is irrational. That the Palestinians are not human beings like us… So you get a society without any moral doubts, without any questions marks, with hardly public debate. To raise your voice against all this is very hard.”

On the episode when Israeli forces targeted him

“In the summer of 2003, he was travelling in a clearly marked Israeli taxi on the West Bank. He explains: “At a certain stage the army stopped us and asked what we were doing there. We showed them our papers, which were all in order. They sent us up a road – and when we went onto this road, they shot us. They directed their fire to the centre of the front window. Straight at the head. No shooting in the air, no megaphone calling to stop, no shooting at the wheels. Shoot to kill immediately. If it hadn’t been bullet-proof, I wouldn’t be here now. I don’t think they knew who we were. They shot us like they would shoot anyone else. They were trigger-happy, as they always are. It was like having a cigarette. They didn’t shoot just one bullet. The whole car was full of bullets. Do they know who they are going to kill? No. They don’t know and don’t care. They shoot at the Palestinians like this on a daily basis. You have only heard about this because, for once, they shot at an Israeli.”

On living in the Israeli village of Sheikh Munis

“It is built on the wreckage of “one of the 416 Palestinian villages Israel wiped off the face of the earth in 1948,” he says. “The swimming pool where I swim every morning was the irrigation grove they used to water the village’s groves. My house stands on one of the groves. The land was ‘redeemed’ by force, its 2,230 inhabitants were surrounded and threatened. They fled, never to return.”

On Israel as a democracy

 “Today we have three kinds of people living under Israeli rule,” he explains. “We have Jewish Israelis, who have full democracy and have full civil rights. We have the Israeli Arabs, who have Israeli citizenship but are severely discriminated against. And we have the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, who live without any civil rights, and without any human rights. Is that a democracy?”

I could go on, extensively. My recommendation is that you follow the link below[1] for a thought-provoking encounter with a courageous, committed man.

Footnote

Blogger “bimo”[3] has some balanced observations to make on the subject. One of his recent Palestine items has useful links to two condemnations of biased reporting of the current conflict by western media – one of which is an open letter signed by, among others, Naom Chomsky. So, if you’re interested… yet another coincidence today.

[1]: The Independent

[2]: Haaretz

[3]: bimo

Image: Anja Meulenbelt

BBC: ‘How I missed the boat’

11/11/2012
BBC Director-General George Entwistle

The shortest-serving BBC Director-General ever?

Well, I truly blew it!

I must have been “peddling my ewn cenoe” at the time.

I had started drafting a post earlier today (10th. November) about the ongoing troubles of the BBC in the wake of the sex scandal surrounding Jimmy Savile, and the latest fiasco concerning the resulting accusations of systemic child molestation in the UK, as broadcast (or not) by the BBC’s flagship current affairs programme, Newsnight, and the new DG’s (lack of) knowledge as to what, editorially, was going on in this evidently troubled department.

My drafted headline was:

BBC top dog: ‘Big crisis of trust’,

a very recent quote from the very man, George Entwistle.

It’s just been announced that Entwistle has resigned, on 10th. November, 2012. He took up his position as long ago as… 17th. September, 2012.[1]

Where did I learn this? From a direct news subscriber feed to the BBC.

More to follow (as they say). I was going to tell the story backwards, in any case!

[1]: BBC Online

Image: itv.com

Dat ‘Pikinini bilong Mises Kwin’ him parrot Pidgin: ‘Mi tok pisin orait?’

07/11/2012
Prince Charles Papua New Guinea

Well, I was told you royals liked a bit of nudity!”

The UK’s heir-apparent (well, perhaps – let’s see) is engaged, along with his stunning wife, Camilla, in a royal visit to Papua New Guinea, part of the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee tour.

The press photos I’ve seen so far are a complete throwback to those “Days of Empire” of the previous, and indeed, the nineteenth century, as English royalty and aristocracy toured “the colonies”.

Charles may not yet be as gaffe-prone as his father – aka The Duke of Hazard, who has recently suffered another “indiscreet moment” at a reception for British Indians, concerning the family name Patel.

But, he’s never averse to making himself a prat, all on his own.

Pidgin prince

This time, he’s made a fine speech, incorporating some Pidgin English phrases: specifically, speaking in Tok Pisin – a combination of English and Creole, spoken as the first language by up to 2 million inhabitants of Papua New Guinea. (I shan’t say “natives”, as Charles undoubtedly would.)[1]

I only hope his pronunciation was better than his pathetic public attempt at Welsh so many years ago, after he’d spent a year at the University of Wales, learning the language in preparation for his investiture. (That’s another cracking story, but… )

A Guardian blog muses on how he actually sounded, what with his “cut-glass” English accent. The article also provides examples of Pidgin vocabulary, and explains the way Charles and his father are addressed:

“he introduced himself as the “numbawan picininny bilong Misis Kwin” – the number one child belonging to Mrs Queen. Similarly, when the Duke of Edinburgh visits he is addressed as “oldfella Pili-Pili him bilong Misis Kwin”.[2]

The Guardian proves it has some sense of humour, though where exactly directed is dubious.

The continuing phenomenon of English RP

But, to be more serious: by coincidence, I earlier read a fascinating article on the subject of RP – “Received Pronunciation” – as enunciated by various members of the English royal family and (some) others.

What is RP? Apparently, it’s defined as “the regionally neutral middle class accent of England” [something I find quite difficult to believe – but then, I’m Welsh, with my own, quite regional accent]. According to an ongoing study of current regional accents being conducted by the British Library, RP is undergoing subtle, but discernible, changes. And, contrary to accepted opinion, it isn’t dying out.

“Jonnie Robinson, a curator and linguist at the library, said: “RP isn’t dying out. It is simply changing as a linguistic entity. Just like a Yorkshire accent now will be different from one from a century ago, it is still defined by the same things.

“RP has changed quite dramatically over the last 50 years. Now, people are speaking a more relaxed, modern RP.”

RP seems to have originated in C19 English public schools (I say “seems” as, mercifully, I wasn’t ever there, in either situation!).

It received a new boost in the C20, with the advent of broadcasting technology;

“the BBC ensured its cultural spread in the early twentieth century, as it became the standard voice heard on the corporation.

It was adopted by the expanding middle class and represented an aspirational symbol of social status.”

Even now, although it is [?] one of the most scrutinised and best known of all English accents, RP has only ever been spoken by around 3% of the population, including…

… surprise, surprise, the royal family! [“regionally neutral middle class?”] But, even they are diverging in their use of RP; the Queen and Charles (numbawan pikinini) normally use traditional RP; his son Harry, uses a more modern, relaxed version (whereas his wife Kate is a trad stickler, so analysts declare, thus making her “more royal”).

As for me myself, speaking personally…

As a mere Welsh boyo, I don’t understand none of this accents stuff. I well remembers being totally puzzled at the BBC in Cardiff, by listening to that bloke Marmaduke Hussey, an old-time BBC Governor, telling a group of us how important it was, under times of severe criticism, to “peddle our ewn cenoes”. It took me a few beers to work out what he was actually trying to tell us non-regionally neutral middle class managers. Doh!

Earlier, when I went to an English university, it took me weeks, maybe months, before I could understand what my colleagues were saying.

Oh, the multifarious splendours of the English language, and the torture of listening to the Queen’s Christmas speech! Bob Marley is more comprehensible.

To illustrate what I’m trying to explain, here are some helpful examples (again from The Telegraph):[3]

“What type of RP do you speak?

Poor

Poo-er – Traditional

Paw – Modern

Mature

Matchewer – Traditional

Matchoor – Modern

Beer

Bee-er – Traditional

Bih – Modern

Near

Knee-er – Traditional

Nih – Modern

Foot

Fut – Traditional

Fooot – Modern

Roll

Rowel – Traditional

Rowol – Modern

Old

Eweld – Traditional

Oweld – Modern

Hair

Heeh-er – Traditional

Heeh – Modern

Good

Good – Traditional

Gud – Modern”

Signing off for now,

Oldishfella Pili-Pili him bilong Sofi’ subub  land of sing an’ coal.

[1]: The Independent    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/mi-tokpisin-orait-prince-charles-speaks-pidgin-on-diamond-jubilee-tour-8282883.html

[2]: The Guardian  http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/shortcuts/2012/nov/05/prince-charles-papua-new-guinea

[3] The Telegraph    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9653166/Prince-Williams-cut-glass-accent-is-a-little-less-polished-than-Kate-Middletons.html

Image: Nothing to do with Arbroath   http://arbroath.blogspot.com

Gripping headlines and media gaffes

04/11/2012
The Sun headline Falklands War 1982

The most (in)famous UK press headline ever?

I’d been meaning to post a short series on the practical problems of writing effective headlines. I’m now prompted into writing by a comment I just received, criticising a recent headline of mine:

BBC: US military death toll in Afghanistan reaches 2,000

The commenter complained about this insipid headline, and s/he was correct. (I didn’t publish the criticism as the rest of the email looked a little “spammy”)

My only defence is that I was quoting the original headline on the BBC site. However, I admit that I already had my own reservations about it – so, why didn’t I compose my own?

I was truly caught out on this occasion!

Headline rules

As all of you involved at any level of journalism know, hitting on the “perfect” headline can be so, so difficult. After all, it’s what draws the reader to your story, and particularly so online.

There are several common-sense recommendations for effective presentation; the real difficulty is in the choice and combination of the words themselves.

Some considerations

  • Choose active verbs whenever possible, use present tense
  • Be positive, rather than negative
  • Convey the benefit to the reader
  • Be clear and unambiguous
  • Brevity is a virtue
  • Accuracy: the headline should relate directly to the story
  • Alliteration: debatable
  • Puns: can be dangerous
  • Use of keywords and avoidance of repetition of words
  • Link information to a picture

… and so on.

It’s interesting that several of the relevant sites I checked give different numbers of “rules” – one source lists no fewer than 21! And they all state that one may also break the rules, at times.

RULE 21 – BREAK THE RULES

If you can come up with a headline that breaks all 20 rules but still compels the reader to read on… then use it.”[2]

What a minefield!

A light-hearted survey of the international press

I have been collecting examples of headlines for several months. The sources are many and varied, from UK, USA and Bulgarian English-language news sites.

Why do I do this? Partly to teach myself to avoid some of the pitfalls into which even the most professional papers drop themselves at times.

And partly for fun. It’s always easy to criticise someone else’s writing, but the main point is for some harmless amusement. This is why I do not identify the sources – but it’s worth mentioning that some of the worst howlers come from the “quality” press, not the tabloids.

10 random offenders

1: “10 ton haul includes more than ten tons of elaborate marble statues, fountains and palace pillars looted from Polish rulers”

Brief? Accurate? Self-contradictory use of numbers;

2: “Bulgaria excited despite poor grape harvest”

Really?

3: “British soldier was shot dead by US helicopter”

Active vs. passive, improbable killer, also a redundant verb;

4: “Flooding feared ahead of heavy rain”

Implausible scenario, ambiguity;

5: “Chinese boy gets head stuck in stone balustrade”

Boring, irrelevant (published under News/International/Asia);

6: “Plymouth police taser man with samurai sword”

Delightful ambiguity – except for the swordsman;

7: “South African man accused of shooting dead Swedish honeymooner will go ahead”

Why shoot an already dead person? Ambiguity, again – and the key word “trial” missing:

8: “Ex-Israeli soldier jailed over deaths of Palestinian women”

Did they mean “ex-soldier”?

9: “Chaos Rains in Bulgaria over Drivers with Lights Off”

A spell-checker is not intelligent. Also, a house style allowing capitalisation can cause problems (“Off” vs. “over”);

10: “Witnesses describe shock at seeing Tate Modern fall”

No, the art gallery didn’t collapse – a visitor fell over a balcony parapet:

11: “Naked Miami man shot dead after being found eating another man’s face”

A gory bonus, and an awful headline (technically, I mean).

While preparing my next list of random examples, I’ll also have to carry out a critical review of my own headlines.

Meanwhile, if you come across some good examples of bad headlines, please send them in, along with a link to the source.

PS: I’ve broken the rules in the headline to this post: I should not have used “and”, but a comma. However, I maintain that I was justified, this time…

(For the story about The Sun’s infamous headline from the Falklands War (image above) from someone who was there back in 1982, follow this link.)[3]

[1]: BBC Online

[2]: BD Eye

[3]: The Guardian